Inspection bodies
We work so that you can determine which sample is directed to further examination while still in the field.
When sample volume exceeds inspection capacity, on what basis can prioritisation be carried out?
Inspection capacity is constrained. Because it is not possible to examine every sample to the same depth, prioritisation is in most cases not based on measurement.
- Sample volume grows faster than the inspection time allocated to it
- Further examination is costly and slow to return a result
- The record of a decision made in the field has to be located afterwards
- Findings from different inspectors cannot be compared with one another
What we provide to inspection bodies
A screening step conducted in the field and placed on record.
You base prioritisation on measurement
Which sample is directed to further examination first is determined by the result produced in the field.
You place your findings on record
The decision made in the field is retained together with its date and image data.
Teams apply a standard method
Because results from different inspectors are produced in the same form, they can be assessed together.
What matters in inspection
The three topics that place the greatest strain on capacity planning.
Constrained capacity
As sample numbers rise, the time allocated to each sample inevitably falls.
A lengthening queue
The result for a sample directed to further examination may fall beyond the date the decision is required.
Consistency
The same finding must be recorded in the same form by every inspector.
Let us plan your screening flow together.
We will begin from your annual sample volume and your existing prioritisation arrangements.